Research

Overview

My research interests focus on improving our understanding of the Earth System, how it worked many millions of years ago in 'deep time' and what that can tell us about how it works now in the Anthropocene epoch. I am particularly interested in how the biosphere and the physical components of the Earth System interact now and how life and the planet have co-evolved.

Most of my academic work to date has focused on the transition between the Neoproterozoic (Ediacaran Period) and the early Palaeozoic (Cambrian Period), around 600 to 500 million years ago, when complex animal-rich ecosystems became firmly established throughout the oceans. Earth's physical environment underwent a series of dramatic changes through this interval; some cyclical, and some that have never since been reversed.

There are parallels between the major Earth System changes of the Ediacaran-Cambrian transition and the disruptions that humans are currently causing to the biosphere and to geochemical cycles. With this in mind, I have recently been working to quantify human-driven biosphere (biodiversity, productivity, and biomass) changes in relation to major macroevolutionary events in Earth history, such as the evolution of land plants or the 'Big 5' mass extinctions. This work has included applying the Planetary Boundaries framework to Earth's largest mass extinction event. The result is not reassuring, but through this work I think it is possible for humans to have a substantial positive impact on the wild biosphere and planetary habitability if we can seize that opportunity.

A comparison of the 2025 planetary boundaries from the Stockholm Resilience Centre and the biosphere integrity boundary mapped for the Permian-Triassic mass extinction event ~252 million years ago.
The Planetary Boundaries framework was established to monitor human-driven changes to the Earth System. Here we have mapped the biosphere integrity boundary for the Permian-Triassic Mass Extinction ~252 million years ago (see Wong Hearing et al., 2026).

Early Palaeozoic climate

My main research focus is on understanding Earth's physical environments and climate in 'deep time'. 'Deep time' means different things to different people, but I tend to think of real deep time as being pre-Mesozoic - i.e. before about 252 million years ago, a world before the dinosaurs and very different to the one we know today. I particularly work on the state of the Earth during the Cambrian Period, 540-485 Ma, when many of the modern animal phyla first appear in the fossil record. To do this, I try to combine quantitative and semi-quantitative data from the geological with numerical model simulations to try to put some realistic numbers on Earth's condition. This was the subject of my PhD research at the University of Leicester, and of my two biggest papers to-date.

During my PhD I developed the use of phosphatic 'small shelly fossils' (SSFs) as new source of numerical palaeoclimate proxy data for the early Cambrian Period. These phosphatic SSFs can have extraordinarily well preserved chemistry, include the different isotopes of oxygen in their phosphate skeletons. This means that we can use the ratio of heavy (18O) to light (16O) oxygen in these fossils as palaeo-thermometers to 'take the temperature' of Cambrian oceans over half a billion years ago. The first data to come out of this approach suggest that the Cambrian Epoch 2 world was a warm greenhouse world, similar to the greenhouse worlds of the Jurassic and Cretaceous periods.

Also as part of my PhD research, and continuing since then, I have tried to use semi-quantitative records of palaeoclimate to better constrain Cambrian climates. Climatically sensitive rock types are rocks that form only under specific ranges of climate conditions, such as above/below temperature or precipitation thresholds. One example is glacial tillite which only forms in the presence of land ice. Deposits of climatically sensitive rock types can be compared with climate model simulations of Earth's climate to try to find the 'best-fit' climate to explain the observed geological data.

A graph of absolute palaeolatitude against sea surface temperature. There is a modern gradient in grey, that defines a horizontal sinusoid from about 25 to 30 C near the equator to about 0 C near the poles. The palaeo data gradient is much shallower with temperatures around 35 to 40 C to at 30 to 40 degrees latitude. Above about 50 degrees latitude, the sea surface temperature decreases to between 15 to 25 C. Palaeo temperatures are for the Palaeogene and Cretaceous periods. The Cambrian data are overlayed as two large black diamonds, one at 25 degrees latitude with a temperature of about 35 C, in line with other palaeo data, and the other diamond at 65 degrees latitude with a temperature estimate of about 25 C, also in line with the other palaeo data.
Cambrian sea temperatures measured from SSF phosphate oxygen isotopes are similar to Mesozoic and Cenozoic sea temperatures (after Hearing et al., 2018).
A sea surface temperature map of Earth in the Cambrian Period.
Modelled Cambrian sea temperatures, when the world looked very different (after Wong Hearing et al., 2021).

Small Shelly Fossils - the evolution of biomineralisation

The 'small shelly fossils' (SSFs) are more or less exactly what they sound like - fossils of shelly organisms that are quite small - and they have rather intricate forms. However, as Stefan Bengtson pointed out in 1994, the term 'small shelly fossils' is used for fossils that "are not always small, ... commonly not shelly and ... might equally well apply to Pleistocene periwinkles." In other words, it's not a very useful description for what are really very interesting and useful microfossils. In practice, the term 'SSFs' is generally reserved for small (<20 mm) shells or skeletal elements found in Cambrian-age limestones using standard micropalaeontological processing methods. Often, SSFs are preserved as calcium phosphate, though many of these organisms originally had calcium carbonte skeletons that have been replaced by phosphate.

A four-part figure of a cone-shaped microfossil with latitudinal ridges adorned with nodes. The first part is a 3D rendering of the outside of the fossil; the second part is an X-ray-like transluscent version of the same fossil; the third part is a cross-section through the fossil; the fourth part is a sub-circular cross-section across the specimen and perpendicular to the other parts.
A micro-CT scan of the wizard/witch's hat-shaped tommotiid SSF Lapworthella, likely a stem-group brachiopod. The whole animal would have had lots of these skeletal elements on its back, probably as armour. Scale bars are 100 µm.

Biologically-speaking, the SSFs are an eclectic mix of different animal phyla, including arthropods, molluscs, brachiopods, and sponges. Many of these are considered to be 'stem-group' members of these phyla, meaning that they are quite distantly related to all living forms of these phyla. SSFs have a global distribution and have been found on every modern continent (and on every palaeocontinent that existed in the Cambrian Period). However, it is really hard to correlate deposits of this age around the world, and it is not at all clear how SSF distributions changed over time, and indeed why they seem to become much much less common in the fossil record after the early Cambrian (from about 509 Ma onwards).

Early Palaeozoic fossils

I have been fortunate enough to be able to work with a whole range of mostly invertebrate fossils from the Ediacaran of Newfoundland to the Cretaceous of Dorset. My earliest formal research was on erosion monitoring of the Jurassic Coast World Heritage Site in Dorset where we were trying to understand how the iconic 'Ammonite Pavement' at Lyme Regis was breaking up. My university-based research has focused mostly on the early Palaeozoic interval (the Cambrian, Ordovician, and Silurian periods), and I have been able to study a whole range of invertebrate fossils from this time. Recently I examined a suite of Upper Ordovician graptolites and ostracods (and a few other groups) from Vietnam with the aim of working out exactly where in the Upper Ordovician they were (Katian Stage, we decided in the end). I am currently working on an interesting suite of Cambrian SSFs from Morocco.

Greyscale close-up photograph of the dendroid graptolite Dictyoneam, showing net-like pattern of the graptolite's stipes connected to each other by small bars of periderm.
A greyscale photo of a specimen of the dendroid graptolite Dictyonema from the Phu Ngu Formation, Late Ordovician, Vietnam.

Exceptional fossil preservation

Head shield of Etainia howellsorum - a dark grey D-shape in the middle of a yellow-coloured block of stone with a crown of spikes in the middle of the D show the mouthparts.
A problematic soft-bodied lobed fossil from the Llanfallteg Biota, south Wales (after Hearing et al., 2016).

I have been fortunate enough to work with some exceptionally beautiful fossils that preserve the soft and non-mineralised parts of long-extinct animals. My good fortune here has extended to being able to describe two new species of non-mineralised arthropod, one from the Cambrian Period and one from the Ordovician Period. These exquisite fossils have helped to fill gaps in our understanding about the nature of the diversification patterns of early animals. These days, I am more interested in understanding the processes that lead to such exceptional preservation, and what factors control these processes, than the fossils per se - but I am always happy to see a beautiful fossil!

Teaching & Pedagogy

Since starting to teach my own classes as lectures, practicals, and in the field, I have become increasingly interested in ideas about what makes effective teaching practice. More details of my teaching practice can be found on the Teaching page of this site, but I wanted to share some thoughts on my own practice here. Partly (perhaps mostly) because it is what most interested me, I have always considered practical work to be a crucial part of a scientific education, in particular becuase working science is driven by curiosity and aiming to working things out or discover things. In the geosciences,this includes field work. However, practical-focused teaching has the potential to be a barrier to engagement with science in a world where such barriers really needn't exist. In particular, I have tried to increase the accessibility of my field teaching and that of the whole department over the last few years. Where necessary, this has involved developing high quality alternatives to existing field courses including developing the Rock Garden - a mechanism for teaching field skills on campus - and creating 3D virtual outcrops of some of the most important sites on the UGent Welsh Basin field course. Neither of these 'local' teaching tools should be considered full substitutes for 'real-world' field work, but they provide additional training opportunities for learning and honing field skills in more accessible settings.